Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35


88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Revealed September 2010

Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) is relatively close but the TG-320 (1/2.3") and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) come with different sensor sizes.

The TG-320 was introduced 16 months after the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summation of how the TG-320 grades against the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
TG-320 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2012 | ![]() | September 2010 | More modern by 16 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Olympus TG-320
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
TG-320 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-320 has got physical dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has dimensions of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-320 against the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-320 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 94 and 88 respectively.

Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizes simply by researching technical specs. The pic here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-320 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Olympus TG-320 will result in extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher TG-320 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2010-09-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | GR Engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 180 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) | 140 grams (0.31 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 photos | 320 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $0 | $566 |