Clicky

Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35
Olympus TG-320 front
 
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 front
Portability
88
Imaging
52
Features
37
Overall
46

Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs

Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28mm (F2.5) lens
  • 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
  • Revealed September 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview

In this article, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) is relatively close but the TG-320 (1/2.3") and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) come with different sensor sizes.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The TG-320 was introduced 16 months after the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summation of how the TG-320 grades against the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

 TG-320 GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 
RevealedJanuary 2012September 2010More modern by 16 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Olympus TG-320

 GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 TG-320 
Focus manually Dial exact focus
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

 TG-320 GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-320 has got physical dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has dimensions of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).

Look at the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-320 against the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.

Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-320 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 94 and 88 respectively.

Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison

Generally, its hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizes simply by researching technical specs. The pic here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.

As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-320 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Olympus TG-320 will result in extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher TG-320 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography advice
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Portrait photography advice
33
megapixel count good (14MP)
comes with face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
57
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detect focus
saves RAW formats
no liveview feature
low MP (12 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus TG-320
Street photography with Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
70
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
lighter than others (140g)
no moving screen
no image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Sports photography features
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sports photography features
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
comes with tracking focus
environment proof
low frames per second (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (150 CIPA)
does not have phase detect autofocus
32
nice sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
no liveview feature
max frames per second low (5.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
terrible battery (320 per charge)
lacks phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Travel photography highlights
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Travel photography highlights
67
lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
environment proof
megapixel count good (14MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse mode
not so great battery pack (150 CIPA)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
58
lighter than others (140g)
has built in flash
terrible battery (320 per charge)
low MP (12 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Landscape photography factors
39
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
environment proof
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
not so great battery pack (150 shots)
missing Timelapse mode
47
you can focus manually
pretty good screen size (3")
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
no liveview feature
no image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
terrible battery (320 per charge)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Vlogging info
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Vlogging info
32
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect autofocus
lighter than competition in class (155g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing microphone port
28
provides face detect focus
lighter than others (140 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
 Olympus TG-320Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus TG-320 Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
Category Waterproof Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2012-01-10 2010-09-21
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III+ GR Engine III
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 4288 x 2848
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 200
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) 28mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/2.5
Macro focusing distance 3cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology TFT Color LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 180 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/3200 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 1.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.80 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155 grams (0.34 pounds) 140 grams (0.31 pounds)
Dimensions 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 150 photos 320 photos
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-42B DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Retail cost $0 $566