Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh PX

Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh PX, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the PX (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The TG-320 was manufactured 5 months after the PX so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the TG-320 scores against the PX with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 & Ricoh PX. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Ricoh PX Gallery.

If you're aiming to carry around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-320 has external dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Ricoh PX has dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).

Look at the Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh PX in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the TG-320 against the PX.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-320 and PX is 94 and 95 respectively.

Normally, it's hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes merely by going through a spec sheet. The image underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and PX.

Clearly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can count on the Ricoh PX to show extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs more aggressively.