Clicky

Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-30W

Portability
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Olympus TG-320 front
 
Ricoh WG-30W front
Portability
91 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38

Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs

Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Released January 2012
Ricoh WG-30W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Revealed October 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview

Lets take a closer look at the Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-30W, both Waterproof cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the WG-30W (16MP) is fairly close and they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The TG-320 was manufactured 3 years prior to the WG-30W and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the TG-320 matches up vs the WG-30W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Ricoh WG-30W

		

		

			
 TG-320 WG-30W 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Olympus TG-320

		

		

			
 WG-30W TG-320 
RevealedOctober 2014January 2012Fresher by 33 months
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh WG-30W

		

		

			
 TG-320 WG-30W 
Focus manually  Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension2.7"2.7"Identical display sizing
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen  Lack of selfie screen
Touch display  Lack of Touch display
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison

		

		

			
When you are aiming to carry your camera, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-320 offers outside dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30W has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-30W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the TG-320 vs the WG-30W.
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-30W size comparison
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and WG-30W is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-30W top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Sometimes, it's difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizing just by looking through technical specs. The visual underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and WG-30W.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-30W to render more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The older TG-320 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
	
			Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-30W sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography features
Ricoh WG-30W Portrait photography features
34
 sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
 offers face detection autofocus
 lack of manual focus
 manual exposure not possible
 no external flash support
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW files
36
 sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
 offers face detection focus
 no manual focus
 no manual control
 can't use external flash
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Street Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Street photography factors
Ricoh WG-30W Street photography factors
66
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 weather proofing
 lighter than competitors (155g)
 no moving screen
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW files
62
 has image stabilization (Digital)
 weather sealing
 screen is fixed
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW format
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Sports Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Sports photography features
Ricoh WG-30W Sports photography features
41
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
 offers tracking autofocus
 weather proofing
 continuous shooting slow (1.0 fps)
 no shutter priority
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 not so great battery power (150 CIPA)
 does not have phase detect autofocus
45
 has image stabilization (Digital)
 sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
 offers tracking autofocus
 weather sealing
 low fps (1.0 fps)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary
Travel Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography information
Ricoh WG-30W Travel photography information
67
 lighter than competitors (155 grams)
 weather proofing
 sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
 has built in flash
 reasonably wide (28mm)
 lack of Time Lapse function
 not so great battery power (150 CIPA)
 doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
71
 weather sealing
 sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 rather wide (28mm)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Landscape Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography details
Ricoh WG-30W Landscape photography details
39
 reasonably wide (28mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
 weather proofing
 lack of manual focus
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 small screen (2.7")
 manual exposure not possible
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW files
 not so great battery power (150 shots)
 lack of Time Lapse function
43
 rather wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Digital)
 sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
 weather sealing
 no manual focus
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 tiny screen (2.7 inch)
 no manual control
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Vlogging Comparison
 Olympus TG-320 as a Vlogging camera
 Ricoh WG-30W as a Vlogging camera
32
 reasonably wide (28mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 offers face detection autofocus
 lighter than competitors (155 grams)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
 low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
 lack of external mic support
33
 rather wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Digital)
 offers face detection focus
 good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 no external mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	

		

			
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh WG-30W
 Olympus TG-320Ricoh WG-30W
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus TG-320 Ricoh WG-30W
Category Waterproof Waterproof
Released 2012-01-10 2014-10-09
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3 and  16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 125
RAW pictures    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
AF touch    
AF continuous    
AF single    
Tracking AF    
AF selectice    
Center weighted AF    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detection focusing    
Contract detection focusing    
Phase detection focusing    
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing range 3cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch capability    
Screen technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames per second 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Change WB    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash distance 5.80 m 3.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye
Hot shoe    
AE bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Mic input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 155 gr (0.34 lbs) 194 gr (0.43 lbs)
Dimensions 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 150 photographs 300 photographs
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-42B D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes
Time lapse feature    
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Storage slots One One
Price at release $0 $280