Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-50
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2017
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh WG-50, both Waterproof digital cameras by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-320 was released 6 years earlier than the WG-50 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the TG-320 scores versus the WG-50 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 & Ricoh WG-50. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Ricoh WG-50
| TG-320 | WG-50 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus TG-320
| WG-50 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2017 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 65 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh WG-50
| TG-320 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus TG-320 has outside dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-50 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh WG-50 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-320 compared to the WG-50.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and WG-50 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading through technical specs. The visual here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and WG-50.
As you can tell, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-50 to resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures more aggressively. The older TG-320 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2017-05-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photos | 300 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $280 |