Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-M1
Portability
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh WG-M1, both Waterproof cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-320 was manufactured 3 years before the WG-M1 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the TG-320 scores vs the WG-M1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| TG-320 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus TG-320
| WG-M1 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 32 months |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh WG-M1
| TG-320 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-320 provides external measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh WG-M1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-320 versus the WG-M1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-320 and WG-M1 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing only by checking out technical specs. The visual below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and WG-M1.
As you can tell, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution so you should expect comparable quality of photographs however you should always consider the release date of the cameras into account. The older TG-320 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography factors
Ricoh WG-M1 Portrait photography factors
decent megapixels (14MP)
supports face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
good MP (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Street photography information
Ricoh WG-M1 Street photography information
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
lighter than others (155g)
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
weather proofing
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
low max ISO (800)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh WG-M1 Sports photography highlights
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
weather proof
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (150 shots)
lacks phase detect AF
good MP (14MP)
weather proofing
good battery pack (350 shots)
fixed focal length ((1×)mm)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography factors
Ricoh WG-M1 Travel photography factors
lighter than others (155 grams)
weather proof
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
terrible battery pack (150 per charge)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
good battery pack (350 CIPA)
weather proofing
good MP (14MP)
missing Timelapse function
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-M1 as a Landscape photography camera
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
weather proof
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
terrible battery pack (150 CIPA)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
good MP (14MP)
weather proofing
good battery pack (350 CIPA)
lack of manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length ((1×)mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (1.5 inches)
manual mode not available
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
low max ISO (800)
doesn't have RAW files
missing Timelapse function
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus TG-320
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-M1
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focusing
lighter than others (155 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic jack
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
missing microphone jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-01-10 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 1.5" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 pounds) | 190g (0.42 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 images | 350 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $2,000 |
