Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung CL5
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
95 Imaging
31 Features
14 Overall
24
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Announced February 2009
- Other Name is PL10
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung CL5 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-320 versus Samsung CL5, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and CL5 (1/2.5") feature totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-320 was introduced 2 years after the CL5 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief overview of how the TG-320 scores versus the CL5 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 & Samsung CL5. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Samsung CL5
| TG-320 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 36 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Olympus TG-320
| CL5 | TG-320 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Samsung CL5
| TG-320 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical screen size |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-320 enjoys exterior dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung CL5 has sizing of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-320 versus Samsung CL5 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-320 against the CL5.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and CL5 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specifications. The picture here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and CL5.
To sum up, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The TG-320 with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus TG-320 will deliver extra detail using its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher TG-320 will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Samsung CL5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus TG-320 | Samsung CL5 |
| Also referred to as | - | PL10 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-4.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lb) | 141 gr (0.31 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $0 | $391 |