Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung DV300F
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3ced/f3cedb69b934f7169f253825ad9ca28abd57cd22" alt="Olympus TG-320 front Olympus TG-320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f21bb/f21bbba72691e81aa737426aec1e12ce3349a5bb" alt="Samsung DV300F front Samsung DV300F front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung DV300F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
- Announced January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung DV300F Overview
Below is a thorough analysis of the Olympus TG-320 versus Samsung DV300F, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the DV300F (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The TG-320 was introduced very close to the DV300F which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the TG-320 matches up against the DV300F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung DV300F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-320 and Samsung DV300F. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Samsung DV300F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Samsung DV300F
TG-320 | DV300F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Olympus TG-320
DV300F | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Samsung DV300F
TG-320 | DV300F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2012 | ![]() | January 2012 | Same generation |
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung DV300F Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera, you should think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-320 enjoys physical dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung DV300F has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-320 versus Samsung DV300F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the TG-320 compared to the DV300F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6756/e6756073c258d52648a6a36876f1e30256b5fb4f" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung DV300F size comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung DV300F size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-320 and DV300F is 94 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c48c9/c48c97384fb37387a1cd41b19793f397738fe603" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung DV300F top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung DV300F top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung DV300F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements simply by viewing specs. The photograph below might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-320 and DV300F.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Samsung DV300F to provide you with more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eac32/eac32d96653bd44540bb82a6aea6fd2b93a90d17" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung DV300F sensor size comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung DV300F sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung DV300F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afc09/afc0918fc591b152b0f31fc11d24fead49aa8bfb" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung DV300F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung DV300F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung DV300F Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Samsung DV300F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Samsung DV300F |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2012-01-02 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.5-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m | 4.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155g (0.34 pounds) | 133g (0.29 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-42B | BP88 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $0 | $200 |