Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-10
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Successor is Samsung GX-20
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-10, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and GX-10 (10MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) boast different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-320 was manufactured 5 years later than the GX-10 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summation of how the TG-320 scores vs the GX-10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-320 & Samsung GX-10. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Samsung GX-10
| TG-320 | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 | September 2006 | Fresher by 65 months | |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 210k | Crisper display (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Olympus TG-320
| GX-10 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Samsung GX-10
| TG-320 | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-320 features outer measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung GX-10 has measurements of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") along with a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the TG-320 against the GX-10.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and GX-10 is 94 and 59 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizing only by viewing specs. The graphic below might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and GX-10.
All in all, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-320 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh trickier and the Olympus TG-320 will provide you with more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The newer TG-320 provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Samsung GX-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Samsung GX-10 |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2012-01-10 | 2006-09-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 lbs) | 793g (1.75 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $0 | $850 |