Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-10
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Successor is Samsung GX-20
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-10, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and GX-10 (10MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) boast different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-320 was manufactured 5 years later than the GX-10 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summation of how the TG-320 scores vs the GX-10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-320 & Samsung GX-10. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Samsung GX-10
| TG-320 | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 | September 2006 | Fresher by 65 months | |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 210k | Crisper display (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Olympus TG-320
| GX-10 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Samsung GX-10
| TG-320 | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-320 features outer measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung GX-10 has measurements of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") along with a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the TG-320 against the GX-10.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and GX-10 is 94 and 59 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizing only by viewing specs. The graphic below might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and GX-10.
All in all, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-320 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh trickier and the Olympus TG-320 will provide you with more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The newer TG-320 provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Samsung GX-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Samsung GX-10 |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2012-01-10 | 2006-09-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 lbs) | 793g (1.75 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $0 | $850 |