Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-1L
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
69 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-1L Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 570g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Released February 2006
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-1L Overview
Here is a in-depth overview of the Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-1L, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and GX-1L (6MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and GX-1L (APS-C) use totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-320 was revealed 5 years later than the GX-1L and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1L being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short summary of how the TG-320 grades versus the GX-1L with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-1L Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-320 & Samsung GX-1L. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Samsung GX-1L Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Samsung GX-1L
| TG-320 | GX-1L | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | February 2006 | Fresher by 72 months |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 210k | Crisper display (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1L over the Olympus TG-320
| GX-1L | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Samsung GX-1L
| TG-320 | GX-1L | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-1L Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-320 has got outer dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-1L has sizing of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 570 grams (1.26 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-1L in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-320 compared to the GX-1L.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and GX-1L is 94 and 69 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-1L Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing simply by checking out technical specs. The visual underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-320 and GX-1L.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-320 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus TG-320 will produce extra detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The newer TG-320 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung GX-1L Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Samsung GX-1L | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus TG-320 | Samsung GX-1L |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2006-02-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 5 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 210k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 7.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 lbs) | 570g (1.26 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-42B | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $0 | $0 |