Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung ST6500
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
99 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung ST6500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 102 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung ST6500 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Olympus TG-320 and Samsung ST6500, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the ST6500 (16MP) is very close and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-320 was introduced 12 months after the ST6500 and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST6500 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the TG-320 grades against the ST6500 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung ST6500 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-320 and Samsung ST6500. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Samsung ST6500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Samsung ST6500
| TG-320 | ST6500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 | January 2011 | Newer by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST6500 over the Olympus TG-320
| ST6500 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Samsung ST6500
| TG-320 | ST6500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung ST6500 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-320 comes with exterior measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST6500 has specifications of 102mm x 57mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-320 and Samsung ST6500 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-320 and the ST6500.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and ST6500 is 94 and 99 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung ST6500 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions merely by looking through technical specs. The image here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-320 and ST6500.
As you can tell, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You should expect to see the Samsung ST6500 to result in more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The younger TG-320 provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung ST6500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung ST6500 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Samsung ST6500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus TG-320 | Samsung ST6500 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 102 x 57 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $0 | - |