Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB150F
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Portability
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
Samsung WB150F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Here is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB150F, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is relatively similar and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-320 was introduced around the same time to the WB150F so they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the TG-320 matches up versus the WB150F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 and Samsung WB150F. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Samsung WB150F
| TG-320 | WB150F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Olympus TG-320
| WB150F | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Samsung WB150F
| TG-320 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | January 2012 | Similar generation |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-320 features exterior dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung WB150F has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB150F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view size comparison of the TG-320 and the WB150F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and WB150F is 94 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing only by going over specs. The graphic underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-320 and WB150F.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact resolution so you should expect similar quality of photographs but you have to factor the production date of the products into consideration.
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-320
Portrait photography with Samsung WB150F
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
provides face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
has manual focus
decent megapixels (14MP)
includes face detect focusing
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Street photography information
Samsung WB150F Street photography information
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
lighter than competition (155g)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (188g)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB150F as a Sports photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
weather sealing
slow fps (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
terrible battery (150 shots)
lacks phase detect autofocus
long zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography details
Samsung WB150F Travel photography details
lighter than competition (155g)
weather sealing
decent megapixels (14MP)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse function
terrible battery (150 CIPA)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competition in class (188 grams)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
long reach (432mm)
no Time Lapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography details
Samsung WB150F Landscape photography details
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
weather sealing
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
terrible battery (150 per charge)
missing Timelapse function
has manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB150F as a Vlogging camera
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
lighter than competition (155 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone socket
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focusing
lighter than competition in class (188 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Samsung WB150F |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lb) | 188 grams (0.41 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $230 |