Clicky

Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB210

Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus TG-320 front
 
Samsung WB210 front
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40

Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs

Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2012
Samsung WB210
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
  • 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
  • Announced July 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB210 Overview

Let's look a bit more in depth at the Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB210, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The TG-320 was revealed 6 months later than the WB210 and they are both of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the TG-320 scores against the WB210 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Samsung WB210

          

          

            
 TG-320 WB210 
Screen resolution230k1kClearer screen (+229k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Olympus TG-320

          

          

            
 WB210 TG-320 
Focus manually  Very exact focus
Screen dimension3.5"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.8")
Touch screen  Quickly navigate
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Samsung WB210

          

          

            
 TG-320 WB210 
AnnouncedJanuary 2012July 2011Same age
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  Lacking selfie screen
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
For those who are intending to carry your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-320 enjoys physical measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung WB210 has sizing of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB210 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-320 compared to the WB210.
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB210 size comparison
Using size and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and WB210 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB210 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Oftentimes, its tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing purely by seeing specifications. The photograph below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and WB210.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of photos although you should take the launch date  of the cameras into account.

            Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB210 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-320
Portrait photography with Samsung WB210
33
 resolution is good (14MP)
 comes with face detect focusing
 lack of manual focus
 manual mode not available
 cannot use external flash
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 has no RAW format
39
 focusing manually
 decent MP (14MP)
 features face detect autofocus
 manual mode not available
 external flash not possible
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Street Comparison
 Olympus TG-320 as a Street photography camera
 Samsung WB210 as a Street photography camera
66
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 weather sealing
 lighter than competitors (155 grams)
 no articulating screen
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 has no RAW format
66
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 offers touch to focus
 lighter than competition (174 grams)
 screen does not articulate
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Sports Comparison
 Olympus TG-320 as a Sports photography camera
 Samsung WB210 as a Sports photography camera
40
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 resolution is good (14MP)
 comes with tracking focus
 weather sealing
 very slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
 no shutter priority
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 bad battery pack (150 shots)
 has no phase detect AF
38
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 decent MP (14 megapixels)
 no shutter priority mode
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Travel Comparison
 Olympus TG-320 as a Travel photography camera
 Samsung WB210 as a Travel photography camera
67
 lighter than competitors (155g)
 weather sealing
 resolution is good (14 megapixels)
 has built in flash
 relatively wide (28mm)
 lack of Timelapse mode
 bad battery pack (150 shots)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
71
 lighter than competition (174g)
 offers touch to focus
 decent MP (14MP)
 flash built-in
 pretty wide (24mm)
 great zoom (288mm)
 no Timelapse function
 doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
 sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Landscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-320
Landscape photography with Samsung WB210
39
 relatively wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 resolution is good (14MP)
 weather sealing
 lack of manual focus
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 screen is small (2.7 inch)
 manual mode not available
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 has no RAW format
 bad battery pack (150 CIPA)
 lack of Timelapse mode
46
 focusing manually
 pretty wide (24mm)
 bigger than average screen (3.5")
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 decent MP (14 megapixels)
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
 manual mode not available
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW files
 no Timelapse function
Photography Glossary
Vlogging Comparison
 Olympus TG-320 as a Vlogging camera
 Samsung WB210 as a Vlogging camera
32
 relatively wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 comes with face detect focusing
 lighter than competitors (155 grams)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
 lack of microphone port
33
 pretty wide (24mm)
 touchscreen functionality
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 features face detect autofocus
 lighter than competition (174 grams)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
 doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
 video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
 no microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
        
                
        

          

            
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-320 and Samsung WB210
 Olympus TG-320Samsung WB210
General Information
Make Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus TG-320 Samsung WB210
Category Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2012-01-10 2011-07-19
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio - 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Maximum boosted ISO - 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW data    
Autofocusing
Manual focus    
Touch focus    
Autofocus continuous    
Single autofocus    
Autofocus tracking    
Selective autofocus    
Autofocus center weighted    
Multi area autofocus    
Autofocus live view    
Face detection focus    
Contract detection focus    
Phase detection focus    
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-102mm (3.6x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/2.9-5.9
Macro focus range 3cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3.5 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 1 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch operation    
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual exposure    
Custom white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash range 5.80 m 3.50 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash    
AEB    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 155 gr (0.34 pounds) 174 gr (0.38 pounds)
Dimensions 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 150 shots -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse feature    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC microSC/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $0 $279