Clicky

Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB30F

Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus TG-320 front
 
Samsung WB30F front
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36

Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs

Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2012
Samsung WB30F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
  • Introduced January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB30F Overview

Below, we are matching up the Olympus TG-320 and Samsung WB30F, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the WB30F (16MP) is fairly comparable and they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The TG-320 was unveiled 12 months earlier than the WB30F and they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the TG-320 matches up against the WB30F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Samsung WB30F

          

          

            
 TG-320 WB30F 
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Olympus TG-320

          

          

            
 WB30F TG-320 
IntroducedJanuary 2013January 2012More recent by 12 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Samsung WB30F

          

          

            
 TG-320 WB30F 
Focus manually  Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen  Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display  Absent Touch friendly display
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison

          

          

            
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-320 provides outer dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung WB30F has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-320 and Samsung WB30F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-320 against the WB30F.
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB30F size comparison
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and WB30F is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Quite often, it's difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements only by seeing specs. The photograph underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and WB30F.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should anticipate the Samsung WB30F to produce extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older TG-320 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

            Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung WB30F Portrait photography highlights
33
 good MP (14 megapixels)
 supports face detect focusing
 manual focus not available
 manual exposure not available
 can't use external flash
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
34
 decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
 provides face detect focus
 manual focus not available
 manual exposure not possible
 can't use external flash
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Street Comparison
 Olympus TG-320 as a Street photography camera
 Samsung WB30F as a Street photography camera
66
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 environment proof
 lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
 no moving screen
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
63
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 lighter than competition (128g)
 no articulating screen
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
Photography Glossary
Sports Comparison
 Olympus TG-320 as a Sports photography camera
 Samsung WB30F as a Sports photography camera
40
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good MP (14MP)
 supports tracking focus
 environment proof
 slow frames per second (1.0 frames/s)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 terrible battery life (150 CIPA)
 lacks phase detect AF
44
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
 provides tracking focus
 no shutter priority
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Travel Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography information
Samsung WB30F Travel photography information
67
 lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
 environment proof
 good MP (14MP)
 has built in flash
 quite wide (28mm)
 lack of Timelapse mode
 terrible battery life (150 shots)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
69
 lighter than competition (128 grams)
 decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 missing Time Lapse mode
 doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Landscape Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography advice
Samsung WB30F Landscape photography advice
39
 quite wide (28mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good MP (14MP)
 environment proof
 manual focus not available
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
 tiny screen (2.7 inches)
 manual exposure not available
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
 terrible battery life (150 per charge)
 lack of Timelapse mode
43
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 decent sized screen (3")
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 decent sensor resolution (16MP)
 manual focus not available
 can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
 manual exposure not possible
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
 missing Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging factors
Samsung WB30F Vlogging factors
32
 quite wide (28mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports face detect focusing
 lighter than competition in class (155g)
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
 lack of microphone jack
33
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 provides face detect focus
 lighter than competition (128g)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
 doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
 video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
 missing mic socket
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
        
                
        

          

            
Olympus TG-320 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-320 and Samsung WB30F
 Olympus TG-320Samsung WB30F
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus TG-320 Samsung WB30F
Category Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2012-01-10 2013-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW files    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
Autofocus touch    
Autofocus continuous    
Autofocus single    
Tracking autofocus    
Selective autofocus    
Center weighted autofocus    
Multi area autofocus    
Autofocus live view    
Face detection focus    
Contract detection focus    
Phase detection focus    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Max aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focusing distance 3cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch friendly    
Screen technology TFT Color LCD QVGA TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Change white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance 5.80 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in -
External flash    
Auto exposure bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 155 grams (0.34 lbs) 128 grams (0.28 lbs)
Dimensions 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 150 photographs -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes
Time lapse feature    
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $0 $180