Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
82 Imaging
55 Features
30 Overall
45
Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Launched February 2012
- Renewed by Sigma DP2 Merrill
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview
Here is a thorough analysis of the Olympus TG-320 versus Sigma DP1 Merrill, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sigma. The image resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the DP1 Merrill (15MP) is relatively close but the TG-320 (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-320 was launched around the same time to the DP1 Merrill so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the TG-320 grades vs the DP1 Merrill with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 and Sigma DP1 Merrill. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sigma DP1 Merrill
| TG-320 | DP1 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" | " | Bigger screen (+2.7") |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Olympus TG-320
| DP1 Merrill | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sigma DP1 Merrill
| TG-320 | DP1 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 | February 2012 | Same generation | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-320 has got external measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP1 Merrill has dimensions of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-320 versus Sigma DP1 Merrill in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-320 compared to the DP1 Merrill.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and DP1 Merrill is 94 and 82 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing merely by looking through technical specs. The visual below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and DP1 Merrill.
As you can tell, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TG-320 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Sigma DP1 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus TG-320 | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
| Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | Dual TRUE II engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4704 x 3136 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | () |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | - |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lb) | 330 grams (0.73 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $1,250 |