Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35


83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 75mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Announced January 2013
- Previous Model is Sigma DP2 Merrill

Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Overview
The following is a complete assessment of the Olympus TG-320 and Sigma DP3 Merrill, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sigma. The image resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the DP3 Merrill (15MP) is fairly well matched but the TG-320 (1/2.3") and DP3 Merrill (APS-C) enjoy different sensor size.

The TG-320 was brought out 12 months before the DP3 Merrill which means that they are of a similar generation. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP3 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the TG-320 scores vs the DP3 Merrill when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-320 and Sigma DP3 Merrill. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sigma DP3 Merrill
TG-320 | DP3 Merrill |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP3 Merrill over the Olympus TG-320
DP3 Merrill | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2012 | Newer by 12 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sigma DP3 Merrill
TG-320 | DP3 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-320 enjoys physical measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP3 Merrill has proportions of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") and a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-320 and Sigma DP3 Merrill in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-320 against the DP3 Merrill.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and DP3 Merrill is 94 and 83 respectively.

Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions simply by checking a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-320 and DP3 Merrill.
As you can see, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-320 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Sigma DP3 Merrill will give you greater detail having its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TG-320 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Sigma DP3 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Sigma DP3 Merrill |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 15MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4704 x 3136 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 75mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155g (0.34 pounds) | 330g (0.73 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $0 | $1,353 |