Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma Quattro
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
63 Imaging
68 Features
56 Overall
63
Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Launched February 2016
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma Quattro, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sigma. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-320 was manufactured 5 years earlier than the Quattro and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the TG-320 scores vs the Quattro in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-320 & Sigma sd Quattro. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sigma Quattro
| TG-320 | Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Olympus TG-320
| Quattro | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2016 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 50 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1620k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sigma Quattro
| TG-320 | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-320 has got exterior measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma Quattro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the TG-320 compared to the Quattro.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and Quattro is 94 and 63 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing merely by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-320 and Quattro.
As you can see, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TG-320 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Sigma Quattro will resolve more detail due to its extra 15MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images more aggressively. The older TG-320 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-320 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Sigma sd Quattro |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2016-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 29 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,620k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 3.8 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lb) | 625 gr (1.38 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | BP-61 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $738 |