Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A290
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3ced/f3cedb69b934f7169f253825ad9ca28abd57cd22" alt="Olympus TG-320 front Olympus TG-320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0798d/0798ddacd7eeb1289b58370a77a8d66bd4ccddbb" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front"
66 Imaging
54 Features
47 Overall
51
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Launched June 2010
- Replaced the Sony A230
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A290 Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony A290, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the A290 (14MP) is relatively similar but the TG-320 (1/2.3") and A290 (APS-C) posses different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The TG-320 was released 20 months after the A290 which makes them a generation away from one another. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick summation of how the TG-320 matches up against the A290 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A290 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A290. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Sony A290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony A290
TG-320 | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | June 2010 | Newer by 20 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Olympus TG-320
A290 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony A290
TG-320 | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same screen measurements |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-320 features outside measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony A290 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony A290 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-320 versus the A290.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea7ff/ea7ffb5da3eb775e14c6ec25d30b738a878b0c2d" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A290 size comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A290 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and A290 is 94 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b491a/b491aa7117c05050505618501d4415cb11c157bc" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions merely by going over specifications. The image underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-320 and A290.
To sum up, both cameras feature the identical megapixel count albeit different sensor dimensions. The TG-320 features the tinier sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult. The fresher TG-320 provides an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfe93/dfe93ff35cb3c8ff8537eb76589351440b32e61a" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd751/cd751a5af4c88654ba0cc6b0c83e562a6191c209" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A290 Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2010-06-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155g (0.34 lbs) | 549g (1.21 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 615 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 photos | 290 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $0 | $600 |