Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A300
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Announced January 2008
- Successor is Sony A330
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A300 Overview
Following is a detailed analysis of the Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A300, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and A300 (10MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) feature different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-320 was revealed 4 years after the A300 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the TG-320 grades vs the A300 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony A300
| TG-320 | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | January 2008 | More modern by 49 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus TG-320
| A300 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony A300
| TG-320 | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-320 comes with outer measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony A300 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") having a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A300 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-320 vs the A300.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and A300 is 94 and 64 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes simply by researching specs. The image underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-320 and A300.
All in all, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The TG-320 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Olympus TG-320 will result in extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more recent TG-320 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A300 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
| Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2008-01-30 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) | 632 grams (1.39 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $0 | $0 |