Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A900
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
54 Imaging
67 Features
62 Overall
65
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Launched October 2008
- Replacement is Sony A99
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A900 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A900, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and A900 (25MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) possess totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-320 was manufactured 3 years later than the A900 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the TG-320 grades against the A900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A900 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-320 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony A900
| TG-320 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | October 2008 | Fresher by 40 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Olympus TG-320
| A900 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony A900
| TG-320 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus TG-320 comes with outer dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony A900 has specifications of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A900 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-320 vs the A900.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and A900 is 94 and 54 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizing just by looking at specifications. The photograph below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-320 and A900.
Plainly, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TG-320 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony A900 will resolve greater detail due to its extra 11MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The newer TG-320 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A900 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2008-10-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 25MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 6048 x 4032 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 lb) | 895g (1.97 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 79 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1431 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photos | 880 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | NP-FM500H |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
| Card slots | One | 2 |
| Launch price | $0 | $2,736 |
