Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A6100
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
81 Imaging
70 Features
88 Overall
77
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A6100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Boost to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 396g - 120 x 67 x 59mm
- Launched August 2019
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A6100 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus TG-320 and Sony A6100, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and A6100 (24MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and A6100 (APS-C) come with different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-320 was manufactured 8 years prior to the A6100 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony A6100 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the TG-320 matches up versus the A6100 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A6100 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-320 & Sony Alpha a6100. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Sony A6100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony A6100
TG-320 | A6100 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6100 over the Olympus TG-320
A6100 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2019 | January 2012 | Fresher by 92 months | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony A6100
TG-320 | A6100 |
---|
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A6100 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera often, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-320 has got external measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony A6100 has measurements of 120mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") and a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-320 and Sony A6100 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-320 and the A6100.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and A6100 is 94 and 81 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A6100 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by researching specs. The photograph here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and A6100.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-320 due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony A6100 will render more detail due to its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The older TG-320 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A6100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A6100 Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Sony Alpha a6100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Sony Alpha a6100 |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2019-08-28 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 32000 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 425 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.71x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Flash off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless, hi-speed |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155g (0.34 lbs) | 396g (0.87 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 120 x 67 x 59mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 images | 420 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $0 | $748 |