Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A6300
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
83 Imaging
67 Features
82 Overall
73
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Expand to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Announced February 2016
- Older Model is Sony A6000
- Later Model is Sony A6500
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A6300 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony A6300, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and A6300 (APS-C) use different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-320 was launched 5 years earlier than the A6300 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the TG-320 scores against the A6300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A6300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-320 & Sony Alpha a6300. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony A6300
TG-320 | A6300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Olympus TG-320
A6300 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | January 2012 | Fresher by 49 months | |
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony A6300
TG-320 | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-320 features physical dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony A6300 has sizing of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony A6300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-320 compared to the A6300.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and A6300 is 94 and 83 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing merely by checking a spec sheet. The photograph here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-320 and A6300.
As you can see, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-320 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh harder and the Sony A6300 will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The older TG-320 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A6300 Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus TG-320 | Sony Alpha a6300 |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2016-02-03 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 425 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155g (0.34 lb) | 404g (0.89 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 85 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1437 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 shots | 400 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $0 | $889 |