Olympus TG-320 vs Sony H400
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony H400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Revealed February 2014
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony H400 Overview
Following is a extensive comparison of the Olympus TG-320 and Sony H400, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and H400 (20MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-320 was launched 3 years before the H400 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony H400 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the TG-320 grades against the H400 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony H400 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony H400
TG-320 | H400 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Olympus TG-320
H400 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | January 2012 | More modern by 25 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony H400
TG-320 | H400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-320 comes with outside dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony H400 has measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") with a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-320 and Sony H400 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view scale comparison of the TG-320 versus the H400.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-320 and H400 is 94 and 62 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes just by looking at specs. The picture below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and H400.
All in all, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Sony H400 to give you more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TG-320 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony H400 Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | Bionz(R) |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5152 x 3864 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.4-6.5 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 8.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 X 720 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) | 628 gr (1.38 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 images | 300 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $0 | $268 |