Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX90V
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
91 Imaging
43 Features
63 Overall
51
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX90V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 245g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Launched April 2015
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX90V Overview
Below is a in-depth overview of the Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX90V, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and HX90V (18MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-320 was revealed 4 years prior to the HX90V and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the TG-320 scores against the HX90V when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX90V Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Sony HX90V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony HX90V
TG-320 | HX90V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX90V over the Olympus TG-320
HX90V | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2015 | January 2012 | More recent by 39 months | |
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony HX90V
TG-320 | HX90V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX90V Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-320 offers outside dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony HX90V has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX90V in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-320 against the HX90V.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and HX90V is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX90V Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements only by reading specs. The photograph below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-320 and HX90V.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Sony HX90V to offer greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older TG-320 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX90V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony HX90V Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2015-04-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 18MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 638 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.5x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155g (0.34 lbs) | 245g (0.54 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 pictures | 360 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $0 | $440 |