Clicky

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 III

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35
Olympus TG-320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front
Portability
53
Imaging
52
Features
77
Overall
62

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs

Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Sony RX10 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
  • 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
  • Released March 2016
  • Previous Model is Sony RX10 II
  • Replacement is Sony RX10 IV
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 III Overview

Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus TG-320 and Sony RX10 III, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and RX10 III (1") use totally different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The TG-320 was manufactured 5 years prior to the RX10 III which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the TG-320 scores against the RX10 III in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony RX10 III

 TG-320 RX10 III 

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Olympus TG-320

 RX10 III TG-320 
ReleasedMarch 2016January 2012Newer by 51 months
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1229k230kCrisper screen (+999k dot)

Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony RX10 III

 TG-320 RX10 III 
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison

For those who are going to travel with your camera, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-320 features exterior dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony RX10 III has sizing of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") with a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).

See the Olympus TG-320 and Sony RX10 III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-320 versus the RX10 III.

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 III size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and RX10 III is 94 and 53 respectively.

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by checking specifications. The pic underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and RX10 III.

Plainly, both of those cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-320 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Sony RX10 III will give greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TG-320 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-320 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Portrait photography camera
33
good resolution (14 megapixels)
has face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
71
manual focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (1")
provides face detection focusing
saves RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-320 as a Street photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Street photography camera
66
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lighter than competitors in class (155g)
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
64
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is decent (1")
saves RAW files
weather proofing
more heavy than competition in class (1,051 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus TG-320
Sports photography with Sony RX10 III
40
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
has tracking focus
environment sealing
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
bad battery (150 CIPA)
lacks phase detect auto focus
70
incredible zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
quiet shooting (1/32,000s)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (1")
provides tracking autofocus
weather proofing
great battery (420 per charge)
lacks phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Travel photography factors
Sony RX10 III Travel photography factors
67
lighter than competitors in class (155 grams)
environment sealing
good resolution (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
no Timelapse function
bad battery (150 per charge)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
55
great battery (420 CIPA)
weather proofing
resolution is good (20MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
great zoom (600mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (1,051g)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography information
Sony RX10 III Landscape photography information
39
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14MP)
environment sealing
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
bad battery (150 per charge)
no Timelapse function
63
manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (1")
saves RAW files
weather proofing
great battery (420 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
does not have Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Vlogging features
Sony RX10 III Vlogging features
32
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
lighter than competitors in class (155g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
no microphone support
28
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focusing
high res video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
includes external microphone support
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
more heavy than competition in class (1,051g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-320 and Sony RX10 III
 Olympus TG-320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus TG-320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
Class Waterproof Large Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2012-01-10 2016-03-29
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III+ Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Highest boosted ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 80 125
RAW files
Lowest boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 25
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-102mm (3.6x) 24-600mm (25.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/2.4-4.0
Macro focus range 3cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 2.7
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 230k dots 1,229k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Maximum quiet shutter speed - 1/32000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames/s 14.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.80 m 10.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 3840x2160
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155g (0.34 lbs) 1051g (2.32 lbs)
Dimensions 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 70
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 472
Other
Battery life 150 images 420 images
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-42B NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $0 $1,398