Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 IV
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3ced/f3cedb69b934f7169f253825ad9ca28abd57cd22" alt="Olympus TG-320 front Olympus TG-320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e636d/e636d6d773338e71588b03217805acb83fb0b161" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV front"
52 Imaging
53 Features
82 Overall
64
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Released September 2017
- Replaced the Sony RX10 III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 IV Overview
Here is a extended review of the Olympus TG-320 and Sony RX10 IV, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and RX10 IV (20MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and RX10 IV (1") feature totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The TG-320 was brought out 6 years prior to the RX10 IV and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 IV being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the TG-320 matches up versus the RX10 IV with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 IV Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Sony RX10 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony RX10 IV
TG-320 | RX10 IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 IV over the Olympus TG-320
RX10 IV | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2017 | ![]() | January 2012 | Fresher by 69 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1440k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+1210k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony RX10 IV
TG-320 | RX10 IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 IV Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-320 offers external measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 IV has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") and a weight of 1095 grams (2.41 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-320 and Sony RX10 IV in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-320 against the RX10 IV.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1ff1/a1ff10a5a91e2245022b8501a08243229c0071a6" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 IV size comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 IV size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-320 and RX10 IV is 94 and 52 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6fe07/6fe07878d0210c638aa05ecffee68139ea9ae738" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 IV top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 IV top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 IV Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing merely by going over specifications. The graphic below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and RX10 IV.
Plainly, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TG-320 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF harder and the Sony RX10 IV will deliver extra detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics far more aggressively. The older TG-320 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96d13/96d13e9ea952fe178836e69a31b5694c4b22666d" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 IV sensor size comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 IV sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/268b1/268b1c4b0383ffc6e49c3555f6c9be25d7f1ad76" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2017-09-12 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 315 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 1,440k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 24.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) | 1095 gr (2.41 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 pictures | 400 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $0 | $1,698 |