Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3ced/f3cedb69b934f7169f253825ad9ca28abd57cd22" alt="Olympus TG-320 front Olympus TG-320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a638f/a638fbdfbf56dc62e545c2536c76ceb819a338a9" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 front"
91 Imaging
50 Features
68 Overall
57
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 240g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Revealed August 2012
- Successor is Sony RX100 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 Overview
Following is a detailed analysis of the Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and RX100 (20MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and RX100 (1") have different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The TG-320 was brought out 7 months before the RX100 so they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the TG-320 matches up vs the RX100 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Sony RX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony RX100
TG-320 | RX100 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 over the Olympus TG-320
RX100 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2012 | ![]() | January 2012 | More modern by 7 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony RX100
TG-320 | RX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-320 has physical measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony RX100 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") with a weight of 240 grams (0.53 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-320 versus the RX100.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b793e/b793e6d52b973422ef8ad5ec7a51b5bec92623c2" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 size comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and RX100 is 94 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53153/5315317686ee3fb9e37e2a076894643fd0250938" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through technical specs. The picture underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-320 and RX100.
As you can tell, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-320 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony RX100 will result in more detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged TG-320 will be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e345/4e345c7319aa6ff510598c47daa78403d587e6b8" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86b2b/86b2bb64ac6bf1c259276f7489d7963759bf02b3" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2012-08-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | WhiteMagic TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) | 240 grams (0.53 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 390 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 images | 330 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $0 | $448 |