Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 II
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
89 Imaging
51 Features
74 Overall
60
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 281g - 102 x 58 x 38mm
- Introduced June 2013
- Previous Model is Sony RX100
- Replacement is Sony RX100 III
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 II Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony RX100 II, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and RX100 II (20MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and RX100 II (1") use totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-320 was revealed 17 months before the RX100 II which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summary of how the TG-320 matches up vs the RX100 II for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 II Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Sony RX100 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony RX100 II
TG-320 | RX100 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 II over the Olympus TG-320
RX100 II | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2013 | January 2012 | Newer by 17 months | |
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 230k | Clearer screen (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony RX100 II
TG-320 | RX100 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 II Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-320 has external dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony RX100 II has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 38mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.5") having a weight of 281 grams (0.62 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony RX100 II in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-320 compared to the RX100 II.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and RX100 II is 94 and 89 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 II Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions just by looking at specifications. The picture underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-320 and RX100 II.
Plainly, each of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The TG-320 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony RX100 II will give you extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged TG-320 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 II Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2013-06-27 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 160 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | Xtra Fine WhiteMagic TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m | 15.00 m (ISO Auto (W)) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155g (0.34 lbs) | 281g (0.62 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 38mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 67 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 483 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 images | 350 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (10 sec. / 2 sec. / Self-portrait One-person/ Self-portrait Two-person/ Self timer Continuous (3 or 5 shots)) |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $0 | $598 |