Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 V
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
89 Imaging
53 Features
80 Overall
63
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 299g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Introduced October 2016
- Earlier Model is Sony RX100 IV
- Renewed by Sony RX100 VI
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 V Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony RX100 V, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and RX100 V (20MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and RX100 V (1") use different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-320 was brought out 5 years earlier than the RX100 V and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 V being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the TG-320 grades versus the RX100 V for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 V Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-320 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Sony RX100 V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony RX100 V
TG-320 | RX100 V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 V over the Olympus TG-320
RX100 V | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2016 | January 2012 | More recent by 57 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 230k | Sharper display (+999k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony RX100 V
TG-320 | RX100 V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 V Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-320 comes with outer dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony RX100 V has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony RX100 V in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-320 and the RX100 V.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and RX100 V is 94 and 89 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 V Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading through technical specs. The photograph here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-320 and RX100 V.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-320 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Sony RX100 V will resolve greater detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The older TG-320 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 V Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-01-10 | 2016-10-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 315 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 24.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 10.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155g (0.34 pounds) | 299g (0.66 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 586 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 photographs | 220 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $0 | $998 |