Clicky

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 V

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35
Olympus TG-320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V front
Portability
89
Imaging
53
Features
80
Overall
63

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 V Key Specs

Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Released January 2012
Sony RX100 V
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
  • 299g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
  • Introduced October 2016
  • Earlier Model is Sony RX100 IV
  • Renewed by Sony RX100 VI
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 V Overview

Below, we are reviewing the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony RX100 V, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and RX100 V (20MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and RX100 V (1") use different sensor sizing.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The TG-320 was brought out 5 years earlier than the RX100 V and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 V being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the TG-320 grades versus the RX100 V for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony RX100 V

 TG-320 RX100 V 

Reasons to pick Sony RX100 V over the Olympus TG-320

 RX100 V TG-320 
IntroducedOctober 2016January 2012More recent by 57 months
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1229k230kSharper display (+999k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony RX100 V

 TG-320 RX100 V 
Touch display Missing Touch display

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 V Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-320 comes with outer dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony RX100 V has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs).

Examine the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony RX100 V in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-320 and the RX100 V.

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 V size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and RX100 V is 94 and 89 respectively.

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 V top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 V Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading through technical specs. The photograph here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-320 and RX100 V.

As you can tell, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-320 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Sony RX100 V will resolve greater detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The older TG-320 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 V sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 V Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 V Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography highlights
Sony RX100 V Portrait photography highlights
33
good MP (14 megapixels)
comes with face detect focus
no manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
66
manual focus
high flash sync speed (1/2,000s)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (1")
has face detect focus
supports RAW files
no external flash support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-320 Street photography info
Sony RX100 V Street photography info
66
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
lighter than average (155g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
85
screen tilts
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor size (1")
supports RAW files
lighter than others (299 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-320 as a Sports photography camera
Sony RX100 V as a Sports photography camera
40
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
environment proofing
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
low battery life (150 per charge)
lacks phase detect auto focus
70
silent shooting (1/32,000s)
high fps (24.0 frames per second)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
decent sensor size (1")
has tracking focus
has phase detect auto focus
not so great battery pack (220 CIPA)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-320 as a Travel photography camera
Sony RX100 V as a Travel photography camera
67
lighter than average (155g)
environment proofing
good MP (14MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
low battery life (150 CIPA)
does not have selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
80
lighter than others (299g)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
selfie friendly display
reasonably wide (24mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
not so great battery pack (220 shots)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-320 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony RX100 V as a Landscape photography camera
39
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14 megapixels)
environment proofing
no manual focus
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
low battery life (150 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse function
70
manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (1")
supports RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
not so great battery pack (220 per charge)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus TG-320
Vlogging with Sony RX100 V
32
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focus
lighter than average (155g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic port
81
reasonably wide (24mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
selfie friendly display
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
lighter than others (299 grams)
lack of microphone socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus TG-320 vs Sony RX100 V Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-320 and Sony RX100 V
 Olympus TG-320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus TG-320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V
Class Waterproof Large Sensor Compact
Released 2012-01-10 2016-10-06
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III+ Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4288 x 3216 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 1600 12800
Max enhanced ISO - 25600
Minimum native ISO 80 125
RAW data
Minimum enhanced ISO - 80
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points - 315
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-102mm (3.6x) 24-70mm (2.9x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/1.8-2.8
Macro focus distance 3cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 2.7
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dots 1,229k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.59x
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Max silent shutter speed - 1/32000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 1.0fps 24.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.80 m 10.20 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/2000 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 1280x720 3840x2160
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155g (0.34 pounds) 299g (0.66 pounds)
Dimensions 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 70
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.8
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.4
DXO Low light score not tested 586
Other
Battery life 150 photographs 220 photographs
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-42B NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes
Time lapse feature With downloadable app
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at release $0 $998