Olympus TG-320 vs Sony T90
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3ced/f3cedb69b934f7169f253825ad9ca28abd57cd22" alt="Olympus TG-320 front Olympus TG-320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/895e3/895e35fe9fc2bfd5f53cdb5e49e54d33426999b1" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 front"
96 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony T90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 148g - 94 x 57 x 15mm
- Introduced February 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony T90 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus TG-320 and Sony T90, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the T90 (12MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The TG-320 was released 2 years later than the T90 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony T90 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the TG-320 grades versus the T90 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony T90 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Sony T90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony T90
TG-320 | T90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | ![]() | February 2009 | More recent by 36 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T90 over the Olympus TG-320
T90 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony T90
TG-320 | T90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony T90 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-320 comes with exterior measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony T90 has measurements of 94mm x 57mm x 15mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.6") with a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-320 and Sony T90 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the TG-320 against the T90.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38963/3896399bfc57e1ce812ee7c00720f6a8f2da4383" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Sony T90 size comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Sony T90 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and T90 is 94 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2003/b2003881680e89dce61634b2e1bf544aaca83d1c" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Sony T90 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Sony T90 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony T90 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to see the difference in sensor measurements simply by going through specs. The graphic below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-320 and T90.
All in all, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-320 to produce more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The younger TG-320 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8739/d873972b37bf3335bc70975fcf94a9542b5d7b4a" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Sony T90 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Sony T90 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony T90 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc4a7/bc4a702ebf6620eb9e1e668c97553a79a3810784" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Sony T90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Sony T90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony T90 Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155g (0.34 pounds) | 148g (0.33 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 94 x 57 x 15mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $0 | $259 |