Olympus TG-320 vs Sony T900
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced February 2009
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony T900 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus TG-320 and Sony T900, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the T900 (12MP) is fairly comparable and they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-320 was released 2 years later than the T900 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the TG-320 grades versus the T900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony T900 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-320 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony T900
TG-320 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | February 2009 | Fresher by 36 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus TG-320
T900 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3.5" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony T900
TG-320 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-320 features external dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-320 and Sony T900 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-320 and the T900.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and T900 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizing simply by going through specifications. The photograph underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-320 and T900.
Plainly, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-320 to show more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics much more aggressively. The fresher TG-320 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) | 143 grams (0.32 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $0 | $300 |