Olympus TG-320 vs Sony WX1
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
96 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony WX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.9) lens
- 149g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Revealed August 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-320 vs Sony WX1 Overview
The following is a in depth review of the Olympus TG-320 vs Sony WX1, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and WX1 (10MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and WX1 (1/2.4") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-320 was released 2 years after the WX1 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony WX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the TG-320 scores vs the WX1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-320 vs Sony WX1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Sony WX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony WX1
| TG-320 | WX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Sony WX1 over the Olympus TG-320
| WX1 | TG-320 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony WX1
| TG-320 | WX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal display sizing |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony WX1 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-320 provides outer measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony WX1 has dimensions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") and a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-320 vs Sony WX1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-320 compared to the WX1.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and WX1 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony WX1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and WX1.
Clearly, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-320 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus TG-320 will offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos more aggressively. The more recent TG-320 will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony WX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony WX1 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2009-08-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 160 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.4-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lb) | 149 gr (0.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $0 | $149 |
