Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A68
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
64 Imaging
66 Features
70 Overall
67
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A68 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 610g - 143 x 104 x 81mm
- Introduced November 2015
- Previous Model is Sony A65
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A68 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus TG-320 and Sony A68, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and A68 (24MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and A68 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-320 was announced 4 years before the A68 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony A68 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the TG-320 matches up versus the A68 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A68 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-320 and Sony SLT-A68. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Sony A68 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony A68
TG-320 | A68 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A68 over the Olympus TG-320
A68 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2015 | January 2012 | Newer by 46 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony A68
TG-320 | A68 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A68 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-320 has got external dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony A68 has dimensions of 143mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") having a weight of 610 grams (1.34 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-320 and Sony A68 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the TG-320 and the A68.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and A68 is 94 and 64 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A68 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by going over specs. The pic underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-320 and A68.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-320 with its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony A68 will offer you greater detail with its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged TG-320 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A68 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A68 Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Sony SLT-A68 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus TG-320 | Sony SLT-A68 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2015-11-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 79 |
Cross focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Flash off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Rear sync, Wireless, High Speed sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 30p, 24p), 1440 x 1080, 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) | 610 grams (1.34 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 143 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 701 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 pictures | 510 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (Yes (2 or 12 sec)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $0 | $581 |