Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A77
Portability
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Portability
59 Imaging
64 Features
83 Overall
71
59 Imaging
64 Features
83 Overall
71
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A77 Key Specs
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
Sony A77
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 50 - 16000 (Increase to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 732g - 143 x 104 x 81mm
- Released October 2011
- Succeeded the Sony A700
- New Model is Sony A77 II
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A77 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony A77, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and A77 (24MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and A77 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-320 was brought out 3 months later than the A77 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony A77 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the TG-320 scores versus the A77 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A77 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-320 & Sony SLT-A77. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Sony A77 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony A77
| TG-320 | A77 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A77 over the Olympus TG-320
| A77 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony A77
| TG-320 | A77 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | October 2011 | Similar age |
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A77 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-320 offers outside measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony A77 has measurements of 143mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") having a weight of 732 grams (1.61 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony A77 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the TG-320 versus the A77.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-320 and A77 is 94 and 59 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A77 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to see the difference between sensor sizing just by going over technical specs. The visual below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and A77.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-320 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony A77 will offer you extra detail having its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos far more aggressively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A77 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-320
Portrait photography with Sony A77
MP count decent (14MP)
features face detect focus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
features face detect focus
exports RAW formats
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Street photography factors
Sony A77 Street photography factors
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
lighter than average in class (155g)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
screen can move to multiple angles
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
environment proof
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus TG-320
Sports photography with Sony A77
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
features tracking focus
environment proofing
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (150 per charge)
does not have phase detect auto focus
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count decent (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
environment proof
supports phase detect auto focus
low battery power (470 per charge)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography highlights
Sony A77 Travel photography highlights
lighter than average in class (155 grams)
environment proofing
MP count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
terrible battery power (150 shots)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
environment proof
megapixel count decent (24 megapixels)
built-in flash
display is selfie friendly
no Time Lapse recording
low battery power (470 shots)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography information
Sony A77 Landscape photography information
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
environment proofing
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
terrible battery power (150 shots)
does not have Timelapse mode
you can focus manually
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count decent (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
environment proof
low battery power (470 shots)
no Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging factors
Sony A77 Vlogging factors
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focus
lighter than average in class (155g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone socket
display is selfie friendly
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
features face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
comes with mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony A77 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Sony SLT-A77 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Sony SLT-A77 |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2011-10-25 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 24MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 16000 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 50 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 19 |
| Cross type focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 12.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) | 732 grams (1.61 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 143 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.2 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 801 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photos | 470 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | NP-FM500H |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $900 |