Olympus TG-320 vs Zeiss ZX1
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
67 Imaging
79 Features
62 Overall
72
Olympus TG-320 vs Zeiss ZX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 37MP - Full frame Sensor
- 4.34" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 51200
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 35mm (F2-22) lens
- 800g - 142 x 93 x 46mm
- Launched September 2018
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-320 vs Zeiss ZX1 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-320 and Zeiss ZX1, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Zeiss. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and ZX1 (37MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and ZX1 (Full frame) have totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-320 was launched 7 years prior to the ZX1 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Zeiss ZX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the TG-320 scores versus the ZX1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-320 vs Zeiss ZX1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-320 & Zeiss ZX1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Zeiss ZX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Zeiss ZX1
| TG-320 | ZX1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Zeiss ZX1 over the Olympus TG-320
| ZX1 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2018 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 81 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen size | 4.34" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+1.64") |
| Screen resolution | 2765k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+2535k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Zeiss ZX1
| TG-320 | ZX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Zeiss ZX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-320 provides outer measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Zeiss ZX1 has measurements of 142mm x 93mm x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") having a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-320 and Zeiss ZX1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-320 compared to the ZX1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and ZX1 is 94 and 67 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Zeiss ZX1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading specs. The graphic underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and ZX1.
All in all, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-320 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Zeiss ZX1 will deliver more detail utilizing its extra 23MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The older TG-320 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-320 vs Zeiss ZX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-320 vs Zeiss ZX1 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Zeiss ZX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Zeiss |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Zeiss ZX1 |
| Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2018-09-27 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 36 x 24mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 864.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 37 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 7488 x 4992 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 51200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 255 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2-22 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 4.34" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 2,765k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 6,221k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) | 800 grams (1.76 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 142 x 93 x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | 512GB internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $0 | - |
