Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3N
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7eddc/7eddc1de1900bdf7cc3907ab82968f90c4856591" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-3N front Sony Alpha NEX-3N front"
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- New Model is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Launched February 2013
- Older Model is Sony NEX-F3
- Successor is Sony a5000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3N, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the NEX-3N (16MP) is very similar but the VR-320 (1/2.3") and NEX-3N (APS-C) possess different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The VR-320 was revealed 19 months before the NEX-3N making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the VR-320 grades vs the NEX-3N with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-320 & Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The full galleries are available at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony NEX-3N
VR-320 | NEX-3N |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Olympus VR-320
NEX-3N | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2013 | ![]() | July 2011 | Fresher by 19 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony NEX-3N
VR-320 | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 has external dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sony NEX-3N has measurements of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3N in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the VR-320 compared to the NEX-3N.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0ccb/c0ccbeb999257005224b3c72cdc11eb000b9f1a0" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-320 and NEX-3N is 94 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51e80/51e8071b0568fa475ff871a28120b307b76c9913" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading a spec sheet. The photograph here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-320 and NEX-3N.
As you can see, the two cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The VR-320 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Sony NEX-3N will offer greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older VR-320 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e7df/7e7df3d043105602e2a6b08d7e5e917dae169457" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a822d/a822d4ac8a77e5b6772248d574ccd26ad7ca9aed" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2011-07-19 | 2013-02-25 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 16000 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 pounds) | 269g (0.59 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1067 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 480 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $179 | $399 |