Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus VH-410
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
95 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus TG-610 versus Olympus VH-410, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the TG-610 (14MP) and the VH-410 (16MP) is relatively close and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-610 was launched 19 months earlier than the VH-410 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief view of how the TG-610 matches up versus the VH-410 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-610 & Olympus VH-410. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-610 Gallery & Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Olympus VH-410
| TG-610 | VH-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Olympus TG-610
| VH-410 | TG-610 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2012 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 19 months |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-610 and Olympus VH-410
| TG-610 | VH-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-610 provides outside measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Olympus VH-410 has dimensions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-610 versus Olympus VH-410 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-610 and the VH-410.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-610 and VH-410 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes just by researching a spec sheet. The pic underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-610 and VH-410.
Clearly, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Olympus VH-410 to result in extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged TG-610 will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-610 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
| Olympus TG-610 | Olympus VH-410 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus TG-610 | Olympus VH-410 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-01-06 | 2012-08-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 152g (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $223 | $186 |
