Olympus TG-610 vs Panasonic GF5
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01ae1/01ae1246b008c2c1438d02f27195e5dcd053dfef" alt="Olympus TG-610 front Olympus TG-610 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e136/8e1367b10b9c9ceac2995dc3e01643b0d0729022" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 front"
89 Imaging
48 Features
54 Overall
50
Olympus TG-610 vs Panasonic GF5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 267g - 108 x 67 x 37mm
- Released April 2012
- Old Model is Panasonic GF3
- Replacement is Panasonic GF6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-610 vs Panasonic GF5 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus TG-610 and Panasonic GF5, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-610 (14MP) and the GF5 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the TG-610 (1/2.3") and GF5 (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The TG-610 was brought out 15 months before the GF5 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-610 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GF5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the TG-610 matches up against the GF5 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-610 vs Panasonic GF5 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-610 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-610 Gallery & Panasonic GF5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Panasonic GF5
TG-610 | GF5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF5 over the Olympus TG-610
GF5 | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 15 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-610 and Panasonic GF5
TG-610 | GF5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus TG-610 vs Panasonic GF5 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-610 offers external dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Panasonic GF5 has dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 267 grams (0.59 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-610 and Panasonic GF5 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-610 versus the GF5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f2e7/8f2e7dc22db656891515df802bf7d760108550c2" alt="Olympus TG-610 vs Panasonic GF5 size comparison Olympus TG-610 vs Panasonic GF5 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the TG-610 and GF5 is 93 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cc99/9cc99ef6f818c8d3372dbacac0b3726eb94b5f85" alt="Olympus TG-610 vs Panasonic GF5 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-610 vs Panasonic GF5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-610 vs Panasonic GF5 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes purely by seeing specifications. The pic underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-610 and GF5.
Plainly, both cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TG-610 because of its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh tougher and the Olympus TG-610 will show more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged TG-610 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c61c7/c61c7d717b28ef4348709cb7daa1ca38e2601ffb" alt="Olympus TG-610 vs Panasonic GF5 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-610 vs Panasonic GF5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-610 vs Panasonic GF5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74818/748187334fddbd1cf11ac7724af783f4a6eb15e9" alt="Olympus TG-610 vs Panasonic GF5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-610 vs Panasonic GF5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-610 vs Panasonic GF5 Specifications
Olympus TG-610 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus TG-610 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2011-01-06 | 2012-04-05 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 160 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 23 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.20 m | 6.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) | 267 gr (0.59 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 108 x 67 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 50 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.0 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 573 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 shots | 360 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $223 | $600 |