Olympus TG-610 vs Pentax Q7
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01ae1/01ae1246b008c2c1438d02f27195e5dcd053dfef" alt="Olympus TG-610 front Olympus TG-610 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff182/ff18240782b3e81fef5b6699b11da2b99c864ba8" alt="Pentax Q7 front Pentax Q7 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
54 Overall
43
Olympus TG-610 vs Pentax Q7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 34mm
- Launched August 2013
- Old Model is Pentax Q10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-610 vs Pentax Q7 Overview
Following is a complete comparison of the Olympus TG-610 vs Pentax Q7, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the TG-610 (14MP) and the Q7 (12MP) is relatively close but the TG-610 (1/2.3") and Q7 (1/1.7") have different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The TG-610 was introduced 3 years earlier than the Q7 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-610 being a Compact camera and the Pentax Q7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summary of how the TG-610 scores against the Q7 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-610 vs Pentax Q7 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-610 & Pentax Q7. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-610 Gallery & Pentax Q7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Pentax Q7
TG-610 | Q7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q7 over the Olympus TG-610
Q7 | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 31 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-610 and Pentax Q7
TG-610 | Q7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus TG-610 vs Pentax Q7 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-610 comes with outside measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Pentax Q7 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-610 vs Pentax Q7 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-610 against the Q7.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77666/7766697b06ae2b3a26231a5c4e402eab845b8715" alt="Olympus TG-610 vs Pentax Q7 size comparison Olympus TG-610 vs Pentax Q7 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the TG-610 and Q7 is 93 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8393c/8393c4f8f1049a098d52737baf692c77b3932ee7" alt="Olympus TG-610 vs Pentax Q7 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-610 vs Pentax Q7 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-610 vs Pentax Q7 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through specifications. The image here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-610 and Q7.
To sum up, both of those cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TG-610 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus TG-610 will provide you with extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged TG-610 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a07e/2a07ef391e42964599af62c2464283b4ad7e59ee" alt="Olympus TG-610 vs Pentax Q7 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-610 vs Pentax Q7 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-610 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3465d/3465d6ac6fea938ff7e392af610de9b314b1427f" alt="Olympus TG-610 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-610 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-610 vs Pentax Q7 Specifications
Olympus TG-610 | Pentax Q7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus TG-610 | Pentax Q7 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2011-01-06 | 2013-08-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 8 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor, wide angle viewing, AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.20 m | 4.90 m (ISO100/m) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | P-TTL, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | FullHD(1920x1080, 30fps/25fps/24fps), HD(1280x720,16:9,30fps/25fps/24fps), VGA(640x480,4:3,30fps/25fps/24fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 200g (0.44 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 102 x 58 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 photographs | 250 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC and Eye-Fi Card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $223 | $480 |