Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
 
               
              92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
- Later Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month        Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-610 versus Ricoh GR Digital III, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-610 (14MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the TG-610 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") feature different sensor measurements.
 Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-610 was released 18 months after the GR Digital III which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a short overview of how the TG-610 grades vs the GR Digital III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
 Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes        Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-610 and Ricoh GR Digital III. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-610 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
| TG-610 | GR Digital III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 18 months | 
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus TG-610
| GR Digital III | TG-610 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | 
Common features in the Olympus TG-610 and Ricoh GR Digital III
| TG-610 | GR Digital III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen | 
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements | 
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 920k | Same screen resolution | 
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen | 
Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-610 has physical measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital III has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-610 versus Ricoh GR Digital III in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-610 versus the GR Digital III.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-610 and GR Digital III is 93 and 92 respectively.
 
          Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizes just by looking at technical specs. The pic here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-610 and GR Digital III.
As you have seen, both the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The TG-610 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Olympus TG-610 will give extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more recent TG-610 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
 
          Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
 
         Photography Glossary
Photography Glossary        Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
 Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
 Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
 Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
 President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
 Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
 Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
        
                
        Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
| Olympus TG-610 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh | 
| Model | Olympus TG-610 | Ricoh GR Digital III | 
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact | 
| Released | 2011-01-06 | 2009-07-27 | 
| Body design | Compact | Compact | 
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | GR engine III | 
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD | 
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" | 
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² | 
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel | 
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 | 
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 | 
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 | 
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - | 
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens | 
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) | 
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.9 | 
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm | 
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 | 
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type | 
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" | 
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot | 
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | - | 
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) | 
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs | 
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs | 
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - | 
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes | 
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | 3.00 m | 
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | 
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 | 
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - | 
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None | 
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | 
| GPS | None | None | 
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) | 208 grams (0.46 pounds) | 
| Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested | 
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photos | - | 
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - | 
| Battery model | LI-50B | - | 
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | 
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal | 
| Storage slots | Single | Single | 
| Price at launch | $223 | $399 | 



