Clicky

Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Olympus TG-610 front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38

Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Olympus TG-610
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
  • Announced January 2011
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Released March 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Here, we are contrasting the Olympus TG-610 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the TG-610 (14MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the TG-610 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor size.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The TG-610 was introduced 10 months after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC so they are of a similar generation. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-610 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the TG-610 scores against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 TG-610 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
ReleasedJanuary 2011March 2010Newer by 10 months
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus TG-610

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC TG-610 
Manually focus  Dial exact focus
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Olympus TG-610 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 TG-610 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display size
Display resolution920k920kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen  Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display  Neither contains Touch friendly display
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

		

		

			
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-610 has got physical measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-610 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the TG-610 versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-610 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 93 and 85 respectively.
Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Usually, it can be hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic here should give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-610 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you can see, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The TG-610 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Olympus TG-610 will deliver extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos way more aggressively. The more modern TG-610 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
	
			Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Photography Glossary	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
 Olympus TG-610 as a Portrait photography camera
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Portrait photography camera
33
 sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
 features face detection focus
 manual focus not available
 manual exposure not available
 can't use external flash
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
36
 focusing manually
 exports RAW files
 doesn't have liveview
 low resolution sensor (10MP)
 tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Street Comparison
Olympus TG-610 Street photography factors
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography factors
62
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 weather proof
 screen does not articulate
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
65
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW files
 lighter than competition in class (355 grams)
 fixed screen
 tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Sports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus TG-610
Sports photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
40
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
 features tracking autofocus
 weather proof
 max frames per second low (1.0 fps)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 bad battery (210 CIPA)
 lacks phase detect auto focus
25
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 doesn't have liveview
 continuous shooting slow (2.0 fps)
 low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
 tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
 lack of phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Travel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus TG-610
Travel photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
64
 weather proof
 sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
 has built in flash
 reasonably wide (28mm)
 doesn't have Time Lapse mode
 bad battery (210 per charge)
 doesn't have selfie friendly screen
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
60
 lighter than competition in class (355 grams)
 flash built-in
 really wide (24mm)
 low resolution sensor (10MP)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Landscape Comparison
Olympus TG-610 Landscape photography info
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography info
43
 reasonably wide (28mm)
 screen is a decent size (3 inches)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
 weather proof
 manual focus not available
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
 manual exposure not available
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
 bad battery (210 CIPA)
 doesn't have Time Lapse mode
47
 focusing manually
 really wide (24mm)
 pretty good screen size (3 inch)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW files
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
 doesn't have liveview
 low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
 tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-610 Vlogging details
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging details
30
 reasonably wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 features face detection focus
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
 doesn't have selfie friendly screen
 low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
 doesn't have external mic port
28
 really wide (24mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competition in class (355 grams)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
 doesn't have external mic port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	

		

			
Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-610 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Olympus TG-610Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus TG-610 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Category Waterproof Advanced Mirrorless
Announced 2011-01-06 2010-03-18
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III+ Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW format    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch to focus    
AF continuous    
AF single    
AF tracking    
AF selectice    
Center weighted AF    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detection AF    
Contract detection AF    
Phase detection AF    
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.9-5.9 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focus distance 3cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 920k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch screen    
Screen technology TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 180 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash range 4.20 m 4.50 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash    
Auto exposure bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 190g (0.42 pounds) 355g (0.78 pounds)
Physical dimensions 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 210 photographs 410 photographs
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature    
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $223 $349