Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01ae1/01ae1246b008c2c1438d02f27195e5dcd053dfef" alt="Olympus TG-610 front Olympus TG-610 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/430cc/430ccaa363774e0b8d316ec9d45b25256b0dcd11" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS front Ricoh WG-4 GPS front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the Olympus TG-610 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, both Waterproof digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the TG-610 (14MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is relatively similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The TG-610 was announced 4 years earlier than the WG-4 GPS and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the TG-610 matches up versus the WG-4 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-610 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-610 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
TG-610 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus TG-610
WG-4 GPS | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 37 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-610 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
TG-610 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-610 features external dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-610 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-610 against the WG-4 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ec62/0ec62ef895d302daf900b63ea4964d76b331c5e8" alt="Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS size comparison Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-610 and WG-4 GPS is 93 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77213/772131f82e7d8263b0fd750cb1018c80b853668b" alt="Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizing purely by going over specs. The graphic here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-610 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to offer you more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older TG-610 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/117e8/117e82967b277b5536f1118bf91bb423ea5d0ab8" alt="Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS sensor size comparison Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b50ab/b50ab9664a7d1321d0fd4d2afc8f9d1593d95c9e" alt="Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-610 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Olympus TG-610 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus TG-610 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2011-01-06 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.20 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 pounds) | 235g (0.52 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 pictures | 240 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $223 | $210 |