Olympus TG-610 vs Samsung SL202
93 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus TG-610 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Also referred to as PL50
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-610 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus TG-610 and Samsung SL202, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-610 (14MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-610 was released 23 months after the SL202 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the TG-610 matches up against the SL202 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-610 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-610 & Samsung SL202. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-610 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Samsung SL202
| TG-610 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 23 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Olympus TG-610
| SL202 | TG-610 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-610 and Samsung SL202
| TG-610 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-610 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-610 has got outer measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-610 and Samsung SL202 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-610 versus the SL202.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-610 and SL202 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-610 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by researching a spec sheet. The pic underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-610 and SL202.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus TG-610 to render greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots more aggressively. The younger TG-610 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-610 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus TG-610 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Olympus TG-610 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus TG-610 | Samsung SL202 |
| Other name | - | PL50 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-01-06 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 pounds) | 168g (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $223 | $140 |