Olympus TG-610 vs Samsung TL225
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37


94 Imaging
34 Features
33 Overall
33
Olympus TG-610 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2009
- Other Name is ST550

Olympus TG-610 vs Samsung TL225 Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-610 vs Samsung TL225, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the TG-610 (14MP) and the TL225 (12MP) is pretty close and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The TG-610 was unveiled 18 months after the TL225 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-610 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the TG-610 matches up versus the TL225 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus TG-610 vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-610 & Samsung TL225. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-610 Gallery & Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Samsung TL225
TG-610 | TL225 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2011 | ![]() | August 2009 | More modern by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Olympus TG-610
TL225 | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1152k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer screen (+232k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-610 and Samsung TL225
TG-610 | TL225 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus TG-610 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-610 provides external measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung TL225 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") with a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-610 vs Samsung TL225 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-610 against the TL225.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-610 and TL225 is 93 and 94 respectively.

Olympus TG-610 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes simply by viewing specs. The pic underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-610 and TL225.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Olympus TG-610 to provide you with greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The fresher TG-610 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus TG-610 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-610 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
Olympus TG-610 | Samsung TL225 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus TG-610 | Samsung TL225 |
Other name | - | ST550 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2011-01-06 | 2009-08-13 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 1,152 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.20 m | 3.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) | 187 gr (0.41 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $223 | $488 |