Olympus TG-610 vs Sony TX200V
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Olympus TG-610 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-610 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Olympus TG-610 vs Sony TX200V, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the TG-610 (14MP) and TX200V (18MP) but both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-610 was released 12 months before the TX200V so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-610 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short introduction of how the TG-610 matches up vs the TX200V when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-610 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-610 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-610 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Sony TX200V
| TG-610 | TX200V |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus TG-610
| TX200V | TG-610 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 12 months |
| Display dimensions | 3.3" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 920k | Clearer display (+310k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-610 and Sony TX200V
| TG-610 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus TG-610 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-610 comes with outer dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony TX200V has measurements of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-610 vs Sony TX200V in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-610 and the TX200V.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-610 and TX200V is 93 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-610 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to see the gap between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The photograph here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-610 and TX200V.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Sony TX200V to resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics more aggressively. The older TG-610 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-610 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-610 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Olympus TG-610 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus TG-610 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2011-01-06 | 2012-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) | 129 grams (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photographs | 220 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $223 | $500 |