Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus VR-320
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41c7c/41c7c096f5b120d51cec7dfdff2b001e8780d88f" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS front Olympus TG-630 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Here is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Olympus VR-320, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both sold by Olympus. The resolution of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The TG-630 iHS was released 18 months later than the VR-320 making them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the TG-630 iHS scores versus the VR-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-630 iHS and Olympus VR-320. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Olympus VR-320
TG-630 iHS | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2011 | Fresher by 18 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
VR-320 | TG-630 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Olympus VR-320
TG-630 iHS | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-630 iHS has outside measurements of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Olympus VR-320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the TG-630 iHS compared to the VR-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44011/44011f8c187f947ac4e37d765e7c4c8081cb9338" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-630 iHS and VR-320 is 94 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0d01/e0d011039b0f190c9bb4ec32a47223e8c3e406a0" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing merely by checking out specifications. The photograph here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-630 iHS and VR-320.
To sum up, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus VR-320 to provide greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The younger TG-630 iHS provides an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9b55/b9b5583ab0d0f4a2749e7a85f1367990ceb0de12" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a650b/a650be274c8cd3f2e2556f566db2af599a2fb99c" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus TG-630 iHS | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Olympus VR-320 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-01-08 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 167 gr (0.37 lb) | 158 gr (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $200 | $179 |