Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A6300

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Sony Alpha a6300 front
Portability
83
Imaging
67
Features
82
Overall
73

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A6300 Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched July 2011
  • Renewed by Olympus VR-330
Sony A6300
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600 (Push to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
  • Revealed February 2016
  • Previous Model is Sony A6000
  • Later Model is Sony A6500
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A6300 Overview

The following is a complete overview of the Olympus VR-320 versus Sony A6300, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and A6300 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The VR-320 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the A6300 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the VR-320 matches up against the A6300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony A6300

 VR-320 A6300 

Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Olympus VR-320

 A6300 VR-320 
RevealedFebruary 2016July 2011Newer by 55 months
Focus manually Very precise focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution922k230kSharper display (+692k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony A6300

 VR-320 A6300 
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurements
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera often, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 features external dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sony A6300 has measurements of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus VR-320 versus Sony A6300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the VR-320 versus the A6300.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A6300 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and A6300 is 94 and 83 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A6300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its difficult to picture the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading specifications. The image below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and A6300.

Plainly, the two cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The VR-320 having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony A6300 will deliver more detail having an extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged VR-320 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A6300 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A6300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography details
Sony A6300 Portrait photography details
33
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
comes with face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
80
has manual focus
resolution is good (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
has face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Street photography camera
Sony A6300 as a Street photography camera
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (158 grams)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
79
has a tilting screen
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW files
weather proofing
good ISO range (25,600)
does not have image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Sports photography camera
Sony A6300 as a Sports photography camera
47
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
comes with tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
75
resolution is good (24 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
has tracking focus
weather proofing
comes with phase detect autofocus
does not have image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Travel photography features
Sony A6300 Travel photography features
70
lighter than others (158g)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
no Time Lapse mode
does not offer selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
76
weather proofing
resolution is good (24MP)
flash built-in
does not have selfie friendly display
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A6300 as a Landscape photography camera
42
relatively wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
79
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony E mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
resolution is good (24 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
weather proofing
does not have image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus VR-320
Vlogging with Sony A6300
32
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect autofocus
lighter than others (158 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
does not offer selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic socket
35
has face detect autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
does have microphone jack
does not have selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A6300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Sony A6300
 Olympus VR-320Sony Alpha a6300
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus VR-320 Sony Alpha a6300
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2011-07-19 2016-02-03
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III BIONZ X
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 24 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4288 x 3216 6000 x 4000
Max native ISO 1600 25600
Max enhanced ISO - 51200
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points - 425
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony E
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) -
Highest aperture f/3.0-5.9 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Available lenses - 121
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 922 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed - 11.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.70 m 6.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p)
Max video resolution 1280x720 3840x2160
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 158 gr (0.35 pounds) 404 gr (0.89 pounds)
Dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 85
DXO Color Depth score not tested 24.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.7
DXO Low light score not tested 1437
Other
Battery life - 400 shots
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model LI-42B NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording With downloadable app
Storage media SD/SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $179 $889