Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FH20
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
93 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FH20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 178g - 100 x 56 x 28mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FS30
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FH20 Overview
Following is a complete comparison of the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Panasonic FH20, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the FH20 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-630 iHS was revealed 3 years after the FH20 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the TG-630 iHS grades against the FH20 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FH20 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-630 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery and Panasonic FH20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Panasonic FH20
| TG-630 iHS | FH20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 37 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH20 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| FH20 | TG-630 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Panasonic FH20
| TG-630 iHS | FH20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FH20 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-630 iHS has exterior measurements of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Panasonic FH20 has dimensions of 100mm x 56mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Panasonic FH20 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-630 iHS and the FH20.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the TG-630 iHS and FH20 is 94 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FH20 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizes purely by going through technical specs. The pic underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-630 iHS and FH20.
As you can tell, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should expect the Panasonic FH20 to show extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more recent TG-630 iHS should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FH20 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FH20 Specifications
| Olympus TG-630 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 |
| Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FS30 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-01-08 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.80 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 167 grams (0.37 lb) | 178 grams (0.39 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 100 x 56 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $200 | $179 |