Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FH22
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
94 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 Key Specs
Olympus TG-630 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Panasonic FH22
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FS33
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Panasonic FH22, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the FH22 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-630 iHS was introduced 3 years after the FH22 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the TG-630 iHS scores vs the FH22 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-630 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FH22 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Panasonic FH22
| TG-630 iHS | FH22 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 37 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| FH22 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Panasonic FH22
| TG-630 iHS | FH22 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-630 iHS provides exterior dimensions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Panasonic FH22 has specifications of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Panasonic FH22 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the TG-630 iHS against the FH22.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-630 iHS and FH22 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions only by seeing specs. The pic underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-630 iHS and FH22.
All in all, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Panasonic FH22 to provide more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The fresher TG-630 iHS will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-630 iHS Portrait photography details
Panasonic FH22 Portrait photography details
provides face detect focus
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
decent MP (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-630 iHS Street photography details
Panasonic FH22 Street photography details
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
image stabilization (Optical)
features touch to focus
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus TG-630 iHS
Sports photography with Panasonic FH22
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking focus
weather proofing
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery life (220 CIPA)
lacks phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
slow frames per second (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-630 iHS Travel photography highlights
Panasonic FH22 Travel photography highlights
weather proofing
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
bad battery life (220 shots)
low megapixels (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
features touch to focus
decent MP (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
no Timelapse recording
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.3)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-630 iHS as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic FH22 as a Landscape photography camera
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
lack of manual mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
bad battery life (220 shots)
does not have Timelapse recording
rather wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
manual exposure not available
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
no Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-630 iHS as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic FH22 as a Vlogging camera
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have microphone socket
rather wide (28mm)
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Optical)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FH22 Specifications
| Olympus TG-630 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 |
| Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FS33 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-01-08 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 167 grams (0.37 lbs) | 170 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $200 | $200 |