Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FS12
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
95 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FS12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-124mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 129g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Announced April 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FS12 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FS12, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the FS12 (12MP) is very similar and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-630 iHS was brought out 3 years later than the FS12 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-630 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS12 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a concise view of how the TG-630 iHS scores versus the FS12 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FS12 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-630 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FS12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Panasonic FS12
| TG-630 iHS | FS12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | April 2009 | Fresher by 46 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS12 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| FS12 | TG-630 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Panasonic FS12
| TG-630 iHS | FS12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FS12 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-630 iHS has physical measurements of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Panasonic FS12 has dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FS12 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the TG-630 iHS compared to the FS12.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-630 iHS and FS12 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FS12 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing just by going over specifications. The photograph underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-630 iHS and FS12.
Plainly, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution so you can expect similar quality of photos however you may want to take the age of the products into consideration. The fresher TG-630 iHS should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FS12 Specifications
| Olympus TG-630 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2013-01-08 | 2009-04-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 31-124mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 167g (0.37 lb) | 129g (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $200 | $228 |