Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41c7c/41c7c096f5b120d51cec7dfdff2b001e8780d88f" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS front Olympus TG-630 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/708ca/708ca63198576f0ffc46689e66eb690a812d18d4" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 front"
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FZ38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Panasonic FZ35, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the FZ35 (12MP) is very similar and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The TG-630 iHS was brought out 2 years later than the FZ35 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-630 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the TG-630 iHS grades against the FZ35 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-630 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery and Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Panasonic FZ35
TG-630 iHS | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2010 | More recent by 31 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
FZ35 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Panasonic FZ35
TG-630 iHS | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-630 iHS has physical dimensions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ35 has dimensions of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") along with a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Panasonic FZ35 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the TG-630 iHS and the FZ35.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/741cf/741cf3f59f84d41aab84eccbc785f23b87d04186" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 size comparison Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-630 iHS and FZ35 is 94 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a39f1/a39f1dcd4a912bd0ba344bbca18119dcbf2995d3" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reviewing specifications. The visual underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-630 iHS and FZ35.
Plainly, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels and you should expect similar quality of photographs however you will want to take the release date of the products into consideration. The younger TG-630 iHS should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8339d/8339dfb64327aa9e373e82f9e202e2483dcd260a" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a496d/a496d9fe7535238dbe9d300fba8619b3da6102cd" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
Olympus TG-630 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-01-08 | 2010-07-06 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-4.4 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 8.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 167g (0.37 lb) | 397g (0.88 lb) |
Dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $200 | $999 |